reesesrants

He’s Not the Messiah (He’s a Very Naughty Boy)

Yesterday was my birthday and my very kind friend Lilah gave me one of the best birthday presents ever – surprise tickets to see the one and only Russell Brand.

Here’s Rusty (as I like to call him) after the show, stripped to the waist and surrounded by adoring fans.

If I was being mean, I would say Russell was out on the prowl looking for sex – he’s been quite open about this tendency in the past and now he’s single again who can blame him. But I think it’s a bit simplistic to say all that Russell is looking for is sex – obviously I don’t know what he is looking for, as I don’t know him, just the version of ‘Russell Brand’ he chooses to present in his performances. I guess what I felt is that Russell is looking for validation and even though he seemed a bit stressed by the crowds, I sensed he felt comforted by the fact that they were there – why else would he want to cuddle them (sex I guess could be the obvious reason…).

The last time Lilah and I went to see Russell was about 3 years ago – at the Albert Hall no less – and back then, his act focused on how he was pilloried by both press and public for the prank calls he made to Andrew Sachs (Manuel in Fawlty Towers) with Jonathan Ross.

The moral panic that ensued resulted in a whopping fine for the BBC and Ross suspended without pay for 3 months

http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2009/apr/03/russell-brand-jonathan-ross-bbc-fine

Fortunately for Brand, the loss of his BBC radio show was more than compensated for by a burgeoning Hollywood movie career – and a burgeoning romance with pop’s most provocative princess Katy Perry.

Fame in the U.S. might have brought big bucks but it also gave Brand a new bunch of haters – in his 2009 show he read out reams of death threats emailed to him by angry Americans who found him far too rich for their palates. I’ve spent far too much of my life working in TV to feel that sorry for celebrities – protected as they are by money, minders and PRs  – but the sheer malice directed against Brand was quite breath taking.

Fast forward to August 2012 and a we saw a very different Russell Brand on stage. Yes, he could be said to be part of the establishment now in that he had just performed in the Olympic closing ceremony – he chatted about this in his usual Russell Brand way, sharing bits of gossip about other celebs, while reminding us all along that he saw the games as propaganda. But I felt that his relationship to celebrity is slightly more ambivalent – after all his relationship with Katy Perry, just beginning when I saw him in 2009,had now ended in divorce. He’s massive in Hollywood but you feel his mind is elsewhere and that Russell wants to do more. You also have the distinct feeling that although we see him as a naughty boy, he sees himself as some kind of messiah. For example, last night Russell expressed sympathy for the much derided David Icke (lizards anybody?), while his spiritual leanings have emerged in several TV interviews, such as this one with Jeremy Paxman in 2011

As the interview with Paxo shows, Russell has become quite a hit on the news and current affairs circuit – he tells a good joke but is also surprisingly well informed on a number of issues. Drugs being one of them. A former addict and recovered alcoholic, Brand has lots to say about the treatment of heroin users – he thinks it’s wrong to give them methadone and thinks that a better solution is to encourage abstinence (with a lot of support and therapy as you do this).

He has made a documentary on the subject for BBC3 which goes out this Thursday and was invited to share his views on Newsnight earlier this month:

To a liberal viewer like myself, Russell comes across as the voice of reason against Daily Mail columnist and rent a right wing troll Peter Hitchens, who drones on about how drugs are illegal and how taking them is a crime, yadda, yadda, yadda. Here’s Hitchens’ account of it on his blog (quite funny if you like laughing at Tories)

http://hitchensblog.mailonsunday.co.uk/

Big tick for Rusty. But watch the clip a little longer and you see Russell applauding the comments of the weasel like Tory called David Burrowes, who also wants to stop giving out methadone to heroin users. Presumably because it costs a lot of money and we all know how keen our government is to stop spending money on poor, sick or unfortunate people – heroin addicts often being all three.

I felt Russell was being played. His obvious humanitarian and progressive instincts are being articulated by a lackey in a regime that wants to stop spending money, but is cunning enough to claim that it’s somehow doing something liberal. It reminded me of the reasons behind so-called Care in the Community in the 80s and 90s; the fact that liberal health professionals wanted to release people with mental problems from grim Victorian asylums was music to the ears of the people who wanted to close down those hospitals and sell them off to developers. Friern Barnet, one of London’s most famous mental hospitals is now luxury flats – this gives a fairly clear account of what happened: http://ezitis.myzen.co.uk/friern.html.

I totally understand Russell Brand’s desires to use his celebrity to do more than just tell jokes and think it is great that people like him exist. Even if a side of him thinks he’s Jesus. But I guess I worry that someone as quirky and authentic as Russell can be owned by shark like politicians who latch on to his thoroughly well meaning ideas to help addicts in a bid to push through their vile spending cuts.

Advertisements
This entry was published on August 14, 2012 at 8:26 pm. It’s filed under Uncategorized and tagged , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink. Follow any comments here with the RSS feed for this post.

One thought on “He’s Not the Messiah (He’s a Very Naughty Boy)

  1. I first was exposed to Brand on Big Brother shows, and thought he was an utter tit of the worst kind.

    However, actually give him a chance and he’s an articulate man with a lot of sense, sure he’s been rather free and easy about offering his bits around, but when an attractive man gets the added appeal of being famous, well, he’s very likely to take advantage of the extra attention he recieves, and I wonder how much is moral outrage and how much is petty jealousy by those who aren’t getting the kind of offers he is 🙂

    He’s then gone on to prove himself with Paxman and the drug policy meetings, although if I’m honest I’d struggle to side with Hitchens against Kim Jong Un.

    The main problem I fear he has, is the kind of people he needs to get his message to are exactly the kind of people who’ll flatly dismiss him for not having a haircut and wearing a suit, sadly. “Whatever could that ghastly man know about anything, he’s not even had a shave!”

    I also don’t care if he’s shagging around whilst having a Jesus complex, now he’s single, so long as he keeps trying to do good.

    I should also say his stand up is FAR superior to most of his TV output, where admittedly he can still come across as a bit of a tit.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: